![]() “Plaintiffs’ wordplay of isolating the transaction from the content itself would offer an easy end-run around this court’s existing decisions applying Section 230, none of which makes protection turn on whether the service received compensation in connection with the purchase of challenged third-party content,” Meta said. ![]() Apple’s lawyers at Weil, Gotshal & Manges said the theory proffered by the casino apps plaintiffs for circumventing Section 230 immunity is "limitless." Meta counsel from Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe echoed that argument, warning the 9th Circuit that “clever lawyers” will find ways to use Davila’s reasoning to recast claims that would be precluded under Section 230. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |